Opinion / Liang Hongfu
Elegant HQ can promote city's image
By Liang Hongfu (China Daily)
Updated: 2006-03-21 06:34
Politicians in Hong Kong can get upset about almost anything. We can
understand the reasons behind some of their objections, but for others,
we simply don't have the faintest clue. Such illogic is best exemplified
in the protest against the government's plan to build a new home for
itself at the old naval dockyard site, Tamar, on the waterfront.
Let's start by asking the simple question: Does the government need a new
home? Anyone who has seen that squatting eyesore on Lower Albert Road
would most probably say yes. The group of low-rise buildings that houses
the government headquarters is a standing example of the worst British
architectural design of the early 1960s. It is the same ugly design that
has more than once drawn the ire of Prince Charles, who considers
buildings of that ilk a blot on the London skyline.
The space inside is a study of banality and triteness, the antithesis of
the vibrant and colourful style for which Hong Kong is known. The offices
are said to be crowded and the many pot plants on the window sills are an
indication of the efforts people who have to work there are making to
liven up the environment.
Some politicians objected to the proposed Tamar project on commercial
considerations. They contend that the valuable site close to the central
business district should be sold in public auction for large-scale
commercial development to enrich the public coffers. Their choice of
locations for the new government headquarters includes the old Kai Tak
airport in the eastern side of the Kowloon peninsula.
Those suggestions may seem sensible and practical on the surface. But the
reasoning behind them is both unimaginative and myopic.
The present location of the government hedquarters is part of what was
the seat of colonial power that included Government House, the army
barracks, which is now Pacific Place, and St. John Cathedral. A short
walk down the hill were the Cricket Club, Hong Kong Club, City Hall and,
of course, the High Court, all at the eastern end of Central. Tamar is
right across the street from City Hall.
Indeed, the presence of the government needs to be seen not only by
citizens but also by the many foreign investors. The best place for it to
be seen in this unabashedly capitalist city is right there in the
business centre.
To be sure, the government headquarters is going to occupy a prime, and
undoubtedly expensive, location as it does now. But the image of Hong
Kong must weigh heavily when computing the opportunities of the Tamar
site.
What's more, as the site of the proposed government headquarters, Tamar
would remain an appreciating public asset for years to come. The one-off
gain of selling it for the development of another nondescript office
tower is small indeed compared to the long-term benefits of projecting
the image of Hong Kong's civil service, widely considered to be one of
the cleanest and most efficient government bureaucracies in the world.
As such, the building of a modern and well-designed government
headquarters on a prime location on the harbour front is more like
brand-building for Hong Kong than a grandiose project for personal
glorification, as some politicians wrongly suggest. There is no way to
tell who is going to be the chief executive when the proposed building is
complete and Hong Kong does not have the tradition of naming government
offices after past or present officials.
The government estimates that the total cost of the proposed project,
excluding land price, would amount to about HK$4.5 billion (US$577
million). That doesn't sound overly extravagant for the headquarters
building of the biggest employer in Hong Kong.
It seems rather strange that one of the strongest arguments put forward
by the government in defence of the headquarters proposal is the creation
of 2,000 or so jobs during the construction period. That can only be a
relatively insignificant side benefit of the proposed project. There must
be many more cost effective ways to create construction jobs.
But let's not get bogged down by trivial arguments. Instead of proposing
false choices to gain political points, Hong Kong lawmakers should
support the project while trying to enlist the help of real professionals
to ensure that the government building would do justice to the natural
beauty and majesty of Hong Kong harbour, instead of smearing it with
mediocre structures that are a reflection of the greed and
short-sightedness of developers.
Email: jamesleung@chinadaily.com.cn
(China Daily 03/21/2006 page4)
Hot Talks
� President's List of Do's and Don'ts for China
� How important is 'Face' (Mian Zi) to everyone?
� The Woeful Health of the Nation
� China, USA should be natural allies
� Beijing's leverage over Taiwan
Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
No comments:
Post a Comment